Originally Posted by
sillan
Napoliyodu thottathu just a last minute conceding alle ponkaa or vanka whatever. I said about the approach in that whole game, only a fool like u may say, we didn't play with intensity for another reason particularly for towards end of run of big games. There was no trying for a win in that game (not crucial at this stage), so was the approach to the game. I still say Klopp didn't want his players much more worse than last night. If we had played as usual against Napoli which was not at all necessary, it would have made it much more easier chittys to get away with 3 points...
City knappanu Pep's usual game approach change ayathu manassilayille - City had even better games (more balls in the box and shots at goal) in the last consecutive losses at Anfield. Pep refused to change approach after 4-3 last year on their second trip and paid the price. Yesterday, not a big change though, but you could see the caution and fear to go forward as they usually do or did last times. This game reminded me of Pep's first visit to Anfield in 16-17 season in which both teams played with caution and only goal of Wijnaldum was the difference. But both teams have grown a lot since that, but a go back from Pep even after such easy run of games not was in my dreams. Now about those penalty cries - Van Dijk's given penalty was right but was a microsecond miss. Lovren's kick on aguero? ven aguero didn't feel , he was not complaining instead got up and moved on. But other City players and Pep were like OMG... "WTF". Van Dijk's handling the ball during corner - annan defendere pulling towards the ball kandillayirikkum. Pakshe Referee chettan kandarunnu. So wasn't given. Atha athu kodukkanjathu ketto Vankikuttaa... If his arm was not pulled towards the ball, it wouldn't have hit his hands. So referee clearly saw fernandinjssjo's foul and given a free kick against ur cry.