Nine - You can interpret in any way you like

[Movie Lover]

Another question. Why did Eva have the same face as his favorite teacher?

Then why did they show the tail end that had drawings inside the caves that indicates that ava was indeed real?
Split personality annu ennu manasilakan paadu ella... Because the makers themselves says that in the film. If that was the case then I don't think they would have had the tail end . Or else they wanted to confuse the viewers just for the heck of it

[ballu]

a similar mental splitting may have happened to someone in their village during the first coming of the comet....a man may have mentally split into a woman....athu avar pictorially represent cheythathayirikkum in the cave.

That possibility is no where mentioned or hinted in the film.

[ballu]

From what we see she is for real. Prakash Raj believes only in science and not anything else. Secondly Prakash Raj has not really spoken to both kid and hakka after these incidents. By the time Prakash Raj came the kid was missing.

It is not that the director is not sure about that. He is leaving a loose end in the story for us to think.

The second version being with the arrival of a comet there is a certain negative energy where the dark side of the mind of a person gets released. Eva is just a dark side of the mind of a person being released when the comet came . That is why when the comet vanished she too vanished along with that.

doesn't prakash raj tell PR that hakka and his assistant confirmed to him that there was no women or anything but it was PR who attacked them?
So when the director says that Prakash Raj's character validated from others about PR having split personality then isn't the tail end with cave drawings contradictory??

[Movie Lover]

Confusion Confusion come again. But you were the one who said Eva is real. But now your statements show that she does not exist.

Secondly there is a dialogue by the kid telling PR to throw her out of the cottage and that she is evil. Oru 7 vayassu payyanu split personalitye kurichokke athra vivaram undo?

doesn't prakash raj tell PR that hakka and his assistant confirmed to him that there was no women or anything but it was PR who attacked them?
So when the director says that Prakash Raj's character validated from others about PR having split personality then isn't the tail end with cave drawings contradictory??

[ballu]

Confusion Confusion come again. But you were the one who said Eva is real. But now your statements show that she does not exist.

Secondly there is a dialogue by the kid telling PR to throw her out of the cottage and that she is evil. Oru 7 vayassu payyanu split personalitye kurichokke athra vivaram undo?

Am still saying that the spirit was real but the point is makers have contradicted this theory to give a split personality angle.
The tail end was done on purpose I believe just to confuse the viewers

As for your second point there is a dialogue from prakash raj about the kid being way too intelligent for his age which he uses to justify the ability of kid to have an understanding of split personality....

[MrWolf]

Randu reethiyilum interpret cheyyavunna reethiyil aanu avar eduthirikkunne. Allathe avarkku urapilanjittonnum alla. Aim is to confuse the viewer and prod us to come up with theories. And they succeeded. Inganathe cinema oru genre aanu. Akam, Carbon etc. Malayalee audiencinu paraichyam illatha kondum cinema kandu kazhinjal ellam manasilaakanam ennum insist cheyunna kondu varunna negative reaction aanu.

My interpretation is that she is real. The bipolar thing is not interesting because it has been done to death in many films.

Sent from my moto g(6) using Tapatalk

[ballu]

Randu reethiyilum interpret cheyyavunna reethiyil aanu avar eduthirikkunne. Allathe avarkku urapilanjittonnum alla. Aim is to confuse the viewer and prod us to come up with theories. And they succeeded. Inganathe cinema oru genre aanu. Akam, Carbon etc. Malayalee audiencinu paraichyam illatha kondum cinema kandu kazhinjal ellam manasilaakanam ennum insist cheyunna kondu varunna negative reaction aanu.

My interpretation is that she is real. The bipolar thing is not interesting because it has been done to death in many films.

Sent from my moto g(6) using Tapatalk

Open end is fine.
Audienceinte interpretationu vittu kodukumpo athu ah cinemayile character or story avam.... Evvide genre thanne interpret cheyanda avastha annu.....

[firecrown]

Can tribals be so educated so as to recognize a psycho? They can recognize a supernatural but not a psycho

they don't have education but they have experience

[firecrown]

From what we see she is for real. Prakash Raj believes only in science and not anything else. Secondly Prakash Raj has not really spoken to both kid and hakka after these incidents. By the time Prakash Raj came the kid was missing.

It is not that the director is not sure about that. He is leaving a loose end in the story for us to think.

The second version being with the arrival of a comet there is a certain negative energy where the dark side of the mind of a person gets released. Eva is just a dark side of the mind of a person being released when the comet came . That is why when the comet vanished she too vanished along with that.

one version is scientific and the other version is supernatural...this may be the intention of the director....to create a conflict between science and superstition.

[firecrown]

Another question. Why did Eva have the same face as his favorite teacher?

prithvi chose her as the face of his dark side