Glad Liverpool showed the level of Arsenal..despite playing at @ 70%. Mo Salah was absolutely sublime.
Sent from my POCO F1 using Tapatalk
Clear off-sides, I don't think it will be missed. Debatable/doubtful ones still may be not given/given. Even though it's still human decisions but with help of tech and its just one year of VAR since wider roll out at international level. You can compare, for example, footballs laws of today and some 20-30 years back. So, VAR will evolve and will get better. Teams got benefited the most in past from wrong decisions may feel it bit tricky to accept but in general teams will feel better and it will take time to get used to accepting decisions on the field.
Glad Liverpool showed the level of Arsenal..despite playing at @ 70%. Mo Salah was absolutely sublime.
Sent from my POCO F1 using Tapatalk
away beyond the worldly rules of right and wrong, there is a field; I will meet you there
David Silva - 400 appearances for Manchester City
Sergio Aguero - 400 career goals (235 for Manchester City)
Already panning out to be a two horse race
Two teams in a different class
Only positions from 3 on wards are up for grabs
VAR inconsistency continues , will take time for all to adapt to it
@Perumthachan
WHU v MC (0-5)
Fouls : WHU 6 , MC 13
MC v TOT (2-2)
Fouls : MC 14 , TOT 4
BOU v MC (1-3)
Fouls : BOU 7 , MC 13
One of City's main weapon against counter attacks , tactical fouls
https://www.theguardian.com/football...ter-city-fouls
Last season, 58.84% of City's 328 fouls were committed inside the opposition half, the third highest in the Premier League.
Who was highest? Liverpool, with 63.17% of their 315 fouls coming in the opponent's territory.
Does that mean Man City and Liverpool are both tactical foul experts?
Not necessarily, because both teams use a high-pressing approach, regardless of whether they have just given the ball away or not.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/49371002