Originally Posted by
Perumthachan
i have not seen the film. for every female who has undergone the grit and made it through, i am sure there might be lots of others who haven't. there have been debates even recently about how the female psyche 'might' fail to perform under pressure in matters relating to national security. one of the reasons for hilary clinton losing against trump was because americans did not have the courage to hand over their defence decisions to a woman president. anyways, though i disagree to the filmmaker's choice of portraying things in the wrong manner for the sake of creative liberty, i am also against films having to undergo clearance from the agencies portrayed because movies should have creative liberty to express the viewpoints. so censor board clearance should be the norm. even today, our films do not have the guts to tackle political issues. if indira gandhi is shown on screen, the character will be called priyadarshini (indira's pet woman) and the actor performing the role would have a sharp nose and a streak of white hair above her forehead. that should change. call indira indira and let the audience decide how much they should take back home when they step out of the theatre.