Page 613 of 1106 FirstFirst ... 113513563603611612613614615623663713 ... LastLast
Results 6,121 to 6,130 of 11060

Thread: 👑DULQUER SALMAAN👑 Official Thread ''THE PRINCE OF MOLLYWOOD''🤴

  1. #6121

    Default


    100 days of love oru typical painkili aanu. Whereas Kali is a racy road movie and you may call it a typical roller coaster ride. Nalla puthuma ulla prameyam aayirunnu.

    100 days of love pole ethra padangal nammal kandittundu. A heroine who is engaged to a possessive arrogant millionaire and she falls in love with the hero who is poor but has a heart of gold

    Such a boring theme..........

    Quote Originally Posted by BangaloreaN View Post

    Kali was a below average affair for me.
    If not for DQ, it would've failed miserably.
    100 DoL was far better for me.

  2. Sponsored Links ::::::::::::::::::::Remove adverts
  3. #6122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BangaloreaN View Post

    Kali was a below average affair for me.
    If not for DQ, it would've failed miserably.
    100 DoL was far better for me.
    Kali was a good film for me.100dol is a crap for me.

  4. #6123
    F.K. VazhipokkaN BangaloreaN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    108,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Movie Lover View Post
    100 days of love oru typical painkili aanu. Whereas Kali is a racy road movie and you may call it a typical roller coaster ride. Nalla puthuma ulla prameyam aayirunnu.

    100 days of love pole ethra padangal nammal kandittundu. A heroine who is engaged to a possessive arrogant millionaire and she falls in love with the hero who is poor but has a heart of gold

    Such a boring theme..........
    Differences in appreciation and views, that's all.

  5. #6124
    F.K. VazhipokkaN BangaloreaN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    108,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abin thomas View Post
    Kali was a good film for me.100dol is a crap for me.
    Yes, for you.

  6. #6125

    Default

    Yup. Perhaps I should have added an IMO which would be more apt.

    Quote Originally Posted by BangaloreaN View Post
    Differences in appreciation and views, that's all.

  7. Likes BangaloreaN liked this post
  8. #6126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shortbread View Post
    Stating that if people call a movie 'brilliant', then one needs to find a different adjective for movies of your liking isn't 'informal dialogue'!. It's stating dislike because their tastes do not match yours. It's fine to dislike an actor or a movie he stars in, you may state your reasons as well. Albeit, it's tasteless to ridicule when others do not share your same opinion.
    we normally associate "brilliant" with movies that really raise to next level... my point was if we start terming very good/verygood movies as brilliant, then the traditionally "brilliant" movies that we are address will need other adjectives..
    i made by point, whether it is stating a dislike or not.. thats why i said it is informal... this is not a managed debate/dialog...
    u can take it or leave it...

    and by ur rules, i think u mean to say that u can question my rights, but i do not have the rights to say what i want...

  9. #6127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamesfanboy View Post
    In terms of film appreciation... There are two kinds of people.

    Some people get so obsessed with a star that they watch a movie to watch that star. For them the whole film is about that star. Their review can even totally be different as they like that star so much.

    The latter category isn't crazy about the star as much. So if the film fails in terms of story or plot, they notice it a lot more.

    Athre ullu sambhavam
    cannot apply in general..
    u can crazy about a star becos of the repertoire of his work, but not necessarily be blind towards him...
    i think on a neutral perspective, we all are capable of understadning the qualities of a film, atleast within ourselves , tough we may not publicly admit it for some reasons..

  10. #6128
    Sinister ballu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Banglore
    Posts
    45,261

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Movie Lover View Post
    100 days of love oru typical painkili aanu. Whereas Kali is a racy road movie and you may call it a typical roller coaster ride. Nalla puthuma ulla prameyam aayirunnu.

    100 days of love pole ethra padangal nammal kandittundu. A heroine who is engaged to a possessive arrogant millionaire and she falls in love with the hero who is poor but has a heart of gold

    Such a boring theme..........
    Kali was completely spoiled by a lackluster ending ....sai pallavi car eduthu poyathu vare nalla build up aayirunu ....pineedu oru maathri kaatu nirachu balloonil otta kuthu koduthu chukki kalanjhathu pole aayi. oru high volatage ending koduthirunel nalla impact undayene .

    100 days of love ...yep....completely superficial ....karan joharinte bubble gum cinemayude oru replica
    വിരഹത്തിൻ ചൂടേറ്റു വാടിക്കൊഴിഞ്ഞു നീ
    വിടപറയുന്നോരാ നാളിൽ
    നിറയുന്ന കണ്ണുനീര്തുള്ളിയിൽ സ്വപ്നങ്ങൾ
    ചിറകറ്റു വീഴുമാ നാളിൽ
    മൗനത്തിൽ മുങ്ങുമെൻ ഗദ്ഗദം മന്ത്രിക്കും
    മംഗളം നേരുന്നു തോഴീ

  11. #6129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moovybuf View Post
    we normally associate "brilliant" with movies that really raise to next level... my point was if we start terming very good/verygood movies as brilliant, then the traditionally "brilliant" movies that we are address will need other adjectives..
    i made by point, whether it is stating a dislike or not.. thats why i said it is informal... this is not a managed debate/dialog...
    u can take it or leave it...

    and by ur rules, i think u mean to say that u can question my rights, but i do not have the rights to say what i want...
    What exactly is this next level? Is it defined somewhere as some particular line or benchmark?

    If my viewing experience was brilliant, then that's exactly what I shall call it as, 'Brilliant'. Your 'traditional brilliant' movies might be outright boring for me to watch. To each their own!

    I found Charlie 'Brilliant'! Unni R said the movie is simply a festival, a simple story about a woman searching for a directionless individual. I thought the movie portrayed the same brilliantly, nothing over the top, it was light and humorous in places, emotional in others, Dulquer portrayed it very well, incorporated the right commercial elements. The technical elements were good, excellent camera work, music complemented the movie perfectly......for me it was Brilliant.

    Might not be for you, but don't tell me what adjective I need to use to view my opinion!

  12. #6130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shortbread View Post
    What exactly is this next level? Is it defined somewhere as some particular line or benchmark?

    If my viewing experience was brilliant, then that's exactly what I shall call it as, 'Brilliant'. Your 'traditional brilliant' movies might be outright boring for me to watch. To each their own!

    I found Charlie 'Brilliant'! Unni R said the movie is simply a festival, a simple story about a woman searching for a directionless individual. I thought the movie portrayed the same brilliantly, nothing over the top, it was light and humorous in places, emotional in others, Dulquer portrayed it very well, incorporated the right commercial elements. The technical elements were good, excellent camera work, music complemented the movie perfectly......for me it was Brilliant.

    Might not be for you, but don't tell me what adjective I need to use to view my opinion!
    u can use what adjective u want.... and if i felt the adjective was not right, i will opine as well.. u can leave it or be bothered...

    last post.. not interested...........

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •