Page 54 of 94 FirstFirst ... 444525354555664 ... LastLast
Results 531 to 540 of 937

Thread: 🏏 ★ 🏏 ★ 🏏 Cricket World🏏 ★ 🏏 ★ 🏏

  1. #531
    FK heart-throb KARNAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Ernakulam
    Posts
    36,199

    Default


    IPL 2018: Player retention becomes bone of contention
    The IPL governing council proposed to allow three players to be retained by eight franchises whereas two players will be allowed for a right to match by the IPL teams.
    As IPL goes into its 11th edition, Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals will be back after serving two-year suspensions. The BCCI had asked franchises how many players they will like to be retained. Mumbai Indians wants five players to be allowed to be retained whereas KKR wants only one player to be allowed per team. Rajasthan Royals wants that everyone should go back to the auction pool. It’s clear that CSK will not compromise when it comes to getting back MS Dhoni.
    Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

  2. #532
    FK heart-throb KARNAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Ernakulam
    Posts
    36,199

    Default

    IPL teams could be allowed to retain three players

    Steven Smith and MS Dhoni have a chat in the field AFP
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Facebook Messenger
    Email
    comment
    12:09 AM IST
    Nagraj Gollapudi
    The eight IPL franchises are likely to be allowed to retain up to three players each before the player auction in the 2018 pre-season. Such a proposal was discussed by the IPL governing council in Delhi on Tuesday. The governing council will meet again next week to deliberate on the issue before making a final decision on November 14 at a workshop with all eight franchises.

    Although a final decision remains to be made, a BCCI official suggested that the three players could be a combination of two Indians and one overseas player, or two overseas players and one Indian. ESPNcricinfo understands that not all franchises have been keen on retaining players, but Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals, the two teams that are returning to the IPL after serving a two-year suspension, were "keen" to retain a certain number of players.

    If the IPL allows the retention of a certain number of players, both these franchises would be able to pick their choices from the two teams that replaced them in the last two editions of the IPL: Rising Pune Supergiant and Gujarat Lions.

    MS Dhoni, Suresh Raina, Ravindra Jadeja, R Ashwin, Ben Stokes, Steven Smith, Brendon McCullum and Faf du Plessis are some of the prominent names that featured for Supergiant and Lions in the last two years.

    It is understood that the IPL chief operating officer Hemang Amin met with representatives of the eight franchises in the last few months to gather suggestions before a final plan is laid out at the franchise workshop next month.

    It is not just the number of players that should be retained that the franchises have different opinions about - they are also concerned by the purse that will be made available to them.

    Some of the richer franchises are keen to have a maximum purse of INR 80 crore as opposed to some franchises which are happy with INR 75 crore. The IPL governing council is likely to take a final call at its next meeting.

    One franchise official pointed out that the richer teams might want a bigger purse in order to spend big money to retain marquee players. The official suggested the IPL should consider a smaller purse as well as sticking to the retention policy it had used in the past. In 2014, when the retention policy was introduced for the first time by the IPL, every franchise was allowed to retain a maximum of five capped players. Back then every franchise had a salary cap of INR 60 crore, out of which a fixed amount would be deducted for every player retained. The break-up of the deduction was: Player 1 - INR 12.5 crore, Player 2 - 9.5 cr, Player 3 - 7.5 cr, Player 4 - 5.5 cr and Player 5 - 4 cr.

    Simultaneously the franchises could buy back additional players through the right-to-match-card option in the 2014 auction. On Tuesday, the IPL governing council discussed the right-to-match-card option, but there was no clarity on the issue. The right-to-match card essentially gives a franchise the first right of refusal to its players, allowing it to buy its player back after other franchises have completed the bidding process for him.

    In 2014 the number of right-to-match cards available to each franchise was dependent on the number of players already retained. A franchise retaining between three and five players had one right-to-match card, while a franchise retaining up to two players had two right-to-match cards; those not retaining any player had three cards to play.
    Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

  3. #533

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KARNAN View Post
    IPL teams could be allowed to retain three players

    Steven Smith and MS Dhoni have a chat in the field AFP
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Facebook Messenger
    Email
    comment
    12:09 AM IST
    Nagraj Gollapudi
    The eight IPL franchises are likely to be allowed to retain up to three players each before the player auction in the 2018 pre-season. Such a proposal was discussed by the IPL governing council in Delhi on Tuesday. The governing council will meet again next week to deliberate on the issue before making a final decision on November 14 at a workshop with all eight franchises.

    Although a final decision remains to be made, a BCCI official suggested that the three players could be a combination of two Indians and one overseas player, or two overseas players and one Indian. ESPNcricinfo understands that not all franchises have been keen on retaining players, but Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals, the two teams that are returning to the IPL after serving a two-year suspension, were "keen" to retain a certain number of players.

    If the IPL allows the retention of a certain number of players, both these franchises would be able to pick their choices from the two teams that replaced them in the last two editions of the IPL: Rising Pune Supergiant and Gujarat Lions.

    MS Dhoni, Suresh Raina, Ravindra Jadeja, R Ashwin, Ben Stokes, Steven Smith, Brendon McCullum and Faf du Plessis are some of the prominent names that featured for Supergiant and Lions in the last two years.

    It is understood that the IPL chief operating officer Hemang Amin met with representatives of the eight franchises in the last few months to gather suggestions before a final plan is laid out at the franchise workshop next month.

    It is not just the number of players that should be retained that the franchises have different opinions about - they are also concerned by the purse that will be made available to them.

    Some of the richer franchises are keen to have a maximum purse of INR 80 crore as opposed to some franchises which are happy with INR 75 crore. The IPL governing council is likely to take a final call at its next meeting.

    One franchise official pointed out that the richer teams might want a bigger purse in order to spend big money to retain marquee players. The official suggested the IPL should consider a smaller purse as well as sticking to the retention policy it had used in the past. In 2014, when the retention policy was introduced for the first time by the IPL, every franchise was allowed to retain a maximum of five capped players. Back then every franchise had a salary cap of INR 60 crore, out of which a fixed amount would be deducted for every player retained. The break-up of the deduction was: Player 1 - INR 12.5 crore, Player 2 - 9.5 cr, Player 3 - 7.5 cr, Player 4 - 5.5 cr and Player 5 - 4 cr.

    Simultaneously the franchises could buy back additional players through the right-to-match-card option in the 2014 auction. On Tuesday, the IPL governing council discussed the right-to-match-card option, but there was no clarity on the issue. The right-to-match card essentially gives a franchise the first right of refusal to its players, allowing it to buy its player back after other franchises have completed the bidding process for him.

    In 2014 the number of right-to-match cards available to each franchise was dependent on the number of players already retained. A franchise retaining between three and five players had one right-to-match card, while a franchise retaining up to two players had two right-to-match cards; those not retaining any player had three cards to play.
    English ariyaathavare kaliyaakkalle karnaa....

  4. #534
    F.K. VazhipokkaN BangaloreaN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    108,903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KARNAN View Post
    IPL 2018: Player retention becomes bone of contention
    The IPL governing council proposed to allow three players to be retained by eight franchises whereas two players will be allowed for a right to match by the IPL teams.
    As IPL goes into its 11th edition, Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals will be back after serving two-year suspensions. The BCCI had asked franchises how many players they will like to be retained. Mumbai Indians wants five players to be allowed to be retained whereas KKR wants only one player to be allowed per team. Rajasthan Royals wants that everyone should go back to the auction pool. It’s clear that CSK will not compromise when it comes to getting back MS Dhoni.
    I prefer everyone getting released.
    scrap the auction process, let teams directly contract players, like EPL.

  5. #535
    FK heart-throb KARNAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Ernakulam
    Posts
    36,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BangaloreaN View Post
    I prefer everyone getting released.
    scrap the auction process, let teams directly contract players, like EPL.
    Engil mumbai ku gup angu eduthu koduthal pore
    Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

  6. #536
    F.K. VazhipokkaN BangaloreaN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    108,903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KARNAN View Post
    Engil mumbai ku gup angu eduthu koduthal pore

    athentha vere aarudeyum kayyil ullathu cash alle?

  7. #537
    FK heart-throb KARNAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Ernakulam
    Posts
    36,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BangaloreaN View Post

    athentha vere aarudeyum kayyil ullathu cash alle?
    Ambani aayi muttiyal muttidikum
    Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

  8. #538
    F.K. VazhipokkaN BangaloreaN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    108,903

    Default

    Miller smashes record for fastest T20I ton


  9. #539
    F.K. VazhipokkaN BangaloreaN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    108,903

    Default

    Miller smashes record for fastest T20I ton

    35 - Balls taken by David Miller to score a T20I century - the fastest ever in T20 internationals. The record was previously held by his former team-mate Richard Levi, who scored a century in 45 balls against New Zealand in 2012. Incidentally the top three fastest centuries in T20Is are held by South Africans. Miller's century is also the joint third-fastest in all T20s; Chris Gayle and Andrew Symonds have scored centuries in the format in 30 and 34 balls respectively.
    1 - Cricketers to score a T20I century at a position lower than No. 4 - Miller is the first one to do so. The previous highest score from No. 5 or lower was by Corey Anderson - 94, also against Bangladesh earlier this year.
    31 - Runs scored by David Miller against Mohammad Saifuddin in the 19th over of the match. Miller hit five sixes off the first five balls. Miller joined Evin Lewis and Yuvraj Singh as the only cricketers to hit five or more sixes in an over in a T20l. The 31 runs conceded by Saifuddin is the most conceded by a Bangladesh bowler in an over in a T20I. Previously, Rubel Hossain had conceded 29 runs against West Indies in 2012.
    59 - Runs scored by David Miller in the last four overs of the innings - the joint most in T20Is along with Mohammad Nabi. Miller hit six sixes and four boundaries from the 16 balls he faced in this period. Nabi had also scored 59 runs in these overs during his 89 runs from 30 balls against Ireland earlier this year.
    12 - Balls taken by David Miller to go from 51 to 100. His first fifty came from 23 balls. This is Miller's third T20 century and second in South Africa.

  10. #540
    F.K. VazhipokkaN BangaloreaN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    108,903

    Default

    Finally, Sreyas Iyyer is a capped player.
    @sirius @KARNAN @renjuus

  11. Likes KARNAN liked this post

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •